![]() Numerous issues arise from the company’s practices and the use of the database by police authorities (and other public as well as private actors). Despite these decisions, Clearview AI is still pursuing its activities, plans to raise its pool of facial images to 100 billion, and claims that its platform has a legitimate use (see in the context of the war in Ukraine to identify dead Russian soldiers). These actions have already led to several DPAs’ decisions ( Canada, Australia, UK, France, Italy, Hamburg) and fines. Illinois, Vermont, New York, California) and brought complaints to privacy supervisory authorities. Various actors launched legal proceedings against the company in several US states (e.g. Soon after the revelations, several big tech companies (Twitter, Facebook, etc.) sent cease-and-desist letters to Clearview AI. ![]() It sold access to this database to law enforcement authorities (LEAs) and other users. In January 2020, the New York Times revealed that a small company called Clearview AI had collected billions of faces scraped from social media to feed its own face database. This blogpost, divided into two parts, focuses on the legal issues raised by the company’s practices from an EU data protection perspective. Despite several legal actions and decisions by supervisory authorities in Europe and beyond, the company has not stopped its activities. For businesses that don’t commit to digital safety and trust, it’s only a matter of time before they will suffer from data breaches and expensive fines.In January 2020, the New York Times revealed that a US facial recognition software company, Clearview AI, had scraped more than 3 billion face images from social media to feed a database the access to which was sold to police authorities and private companies across the world. ![]() “Developers frequently collect and handle user data in irresponsible ways and without proper disclosure - moreover, they share that data with unknown third parties, who may then share it with fourth and fifth parties. Olson says a majority of organizations with online domains or digital apps violate the guidelines outlined in General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), whether they realize it or not. And, France, Canada and Australia have sanctioned the company.Ĭhris Olson, CEO of The Media Trust, says the ICO’s action against Clearview AI demonstrates that emerging data privacy legislation has “teeth, and businesses around the world need to take it seriously.” Earlier this month, Clearview AI agreed to settle a 2020 lawsuit from the American Civil Liberties Union, which accused the company of violating Illinois's Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), and banned Clearview AI from selling its facial recognition software to most U.S. To delete all data collected on individuals in Italy and prohibited to continue collection and processing activities in the country. In March, Italy's data protection regulator, the Garante, fined the facial recognition company +$20 million for violating the GDPR and ordered Clearview AI “This international cooperation is essential to protect people’s privacy rights in 2022,” he added, noting he would be meeting with regulators in other countries to tackle global privacy concerns. That is why we have acted to protect people in the UK by both fining the company and issuing an enforcement notice.”Įdwards called for international enforcement to help take action and protect people from intrusive activities. UK Information Commissioner John Edwards said, “The company not only enables identification of those people, but effectively monitors their and offers it as a commercial service. This may have acted as a disincentive to individuals who wish to object to their data being collected and used.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |